In this special-assessment dispute, appellant city argued that the District Court erred by setting aside the original $76,479 assessment and determining that respondent’s property received a special benefit of only $24,829. Considered in a light most favorable to respondent, the Court of Appeals concluded that the District Court’s findings were not clearly erroneous because the evidence fairly supported the District Court’s findings. Affirmed.
A15-0366 Pavek v. City of Prior Lake (Scott County)