Free Newsletter
Municipal Assessments Special Benefits
cassiejohnson//December 18, 2015//
In this special-assessment dispute, appellant city argued that the District Court erred by setting aside the original $76,479 assessment and determining that respondent’s property received a special benefit of only $24,829. Considered in a light most favorable to respondent, the Court of Appeals concluded that the District Court’s findings were not clearly erroneous because the evidence fairly supported the District Court’s findings. Affirmed.
A15-0366 Pavek v. City of Prior Lake (Scott County)
Top News
- Who is liable when AI goes rogue? Lawyers see new risks
- Trump says he’ll bring ballroom fight to Supreme Court after lower court halts work
- Trump tries new tack against birthright citizenship after Supreme Court snub
- Justices void contractor’s lien, deny legal fees in construction suit
- Judicial Branch announces death of OLPR’S Humiston
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: Taylor-Travis marriage recalls prenup laws here
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Fast-Tracking Temporary Lawyer Suspensions
- Perspectives: ‘Slam’ suits: Recalling wrestling cases as WWE arrives
- Best At Work Insights: We tore out the workforce backup generator
Legal Tech
- Criminal defense lawyers have duty to use AI, paper argues
- AI is reshaping family law practice, but attorneys worry about DIY research
- Massachusetts court rejects work product protection for AI documents by girlfriend
