Free Newsletter
Contracts – Revolving Credit Default; Tortious Interference Claim; Sanctions
cassiejohnson//July 10, 2015//
Contracts – Revolving Credit Default; Tortious Interference Claim; Sanctions
cassiejohnson//July 10, 2015//
Where a dispute arose between bank customers and a bank over a defaulted revolving credit agreement, and the customers’ trust argued that the district court erred procedurally by going beyond the trust’s claim of tortious interference in granting a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, there was no procedural error and summary judgment for the bank is affirmed, and the court’s imposition of sanctions against the trust and its attorneys was not an abuse of discretion. Judgment is affirmed.
14-1560 Meyer v. U.S. Bank National Association, appealed from the District of Nebraska, Loken, J.
Related Content
Top News
- Who is liable when AI goes rogue? Lawyers see new risks
- Trump says he’ll bring ballroom fight to Supreme Court after lower court halts work
- Trump tries new tack against birthright citizenship after Supreme Court snub
- Justices void contractor’s lien, deny legal fees in construction suit
- Judicial Branch announces death of OLPR’S Humiston
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: Taylor-Travis marriage recalls prenup laws here
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Fast-Tracking Temporary Lawyer Suspensions
- Perspectives: ‘Slam’ suits: Recalling wrestling cases as WWE arrives
- Best At Work Insights: We tore out the workforce backup generator
Legal Tech
- Criminal defense lawyers have duty to use AI, paper argues
- AI is reshaping family law practice, but attorneys worry about DIY research
- Massachusetts court rejects work product protection for AI documents by girlfriend
.png)
