Free Newsletter
IMMIGRATION Removal; New Evidence
cassiejohnson//December 18, 2015//
Listen to this article
Where immigrants from Gambia who married while their appeals were pending moved to remand their cases to the immigration judge, the court lacked jurisdiction to review the discretionary denial of waiver of inadmissibility, and since the immigrants were found to have engaged in an extensive fraudulent scheme, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that allegedly new evidence was not credible and did not establish eligibility for asylum. Petition denied.
14-2858 Njie v. Lynch, Petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Wollman, J.
Top News
- Federal court rules brokerage firm breached 1994 contract
- Court denies revocation of adoption
- UnitedHealth suit alleges faulty AI led to denied claims
- Judge asked to block part of a North Dakota abortion law
- Court dismisses bias, retaliation lawsuit
- Joint-employer rule set to roil workplace — once again
- 8th Circuit rules private plaintiffs can’t sue under Voting Rights Act
- Commentary: Right-to-repair fight centers on data transmitted by newer cars
Expert Testimony
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Risky business and tips for managing the risk
- Perspectives: JFK assassination: 60 years of litigation here
- Perspectives: Lincoln’s memorable address recalls impact here
- The Unfrazzled Lawyer: Five benefits of becoming an unfrazzled lawyer
