Free Newsletter
Student Loan – Dischargeability; Undue Hardship
admin//July 16, 2012//
Listen to this articleWhere the bankruptcy court found that a debtor who sought to discharge his student loans had steady employment with a chance for advancement, received insurance benefits and periodic bonuses and tax refunds, and the record on appeal was sparse with regards to the family’s living expenses with no documentation of claimed mold exposure and related problems, and the court also found that the debtor would be qualify for the Income Contingent Repayment Plan, under the totality-of-the-circumstances the debtor did not meet his burden to show undue hardship and discharge was properly denied. Judgment affirmed.
12-6020 Nielsen v. ACS, Inc., appealed from Southern District of Iowa. Saladino, J.
Related Content
Top News
- Best at Work Insights: Why employee growth matters more than salary
- Justices toss geofence warrant, remand man’s murder case
- Judge calls out Kenosha DA for missed deadlines in murder trial
- ICE agent charged with assault after gun incident on Highway 62
- Justice Department settles with IBM over alleged DEI practices
- Court of Appeals upholds pistol permit revocation
- Wisconsin Supreme Court rules Pabst is liable in steamfitter’s death
Expert Testimony
- Best at Work Insights: Why employee growth matters more than salary
- Legally Speaking: April showers don’t wait, neither do difficult conversations
- Perspectives: Seeking Stanley Cup, Wild recall hockey law here
- Quandaries & Quagmires: ABA Formal Opinion 520
