Free Newsletter
Zoning – Interpretation of Ordinances
A11-1895 RSI Recycling, Inc. v. City of Bloomington (Hennepin County)
Zoning – Conditional-Use Permits
A11-1548 Jordan Cmty. Action Group v. City of Jordan (Scott County)
Zoning – Conditional-Use Permits
A10-1760 Kraemer Mining & Materials, Inc. v. City of Sauk Rapids (Benton County)
Zoning – Equitable Estoppel
A09-1961 City of North Oaks v. Sarpal, et al. (Court of Appeals)
Zoning and Land Use – Cup
A10-1111 Kotten v. Brown County Board of Commissioners (Brown County Board of Commissioners)
Zoning – Conditional Use
A10-0093 Eagle Nests Townhome Association v. Aitkin County Planning Commission (Aitkin County Planning Commission)
Zoning and Land Use – 60-Day Response Period
A09-2347 Stokke v. Marshan Township (Dakota County)
Zoning and Land Use – Interim Ordinance
A08-1697 Pawn America Minnesota, LLC v. City of St. Louis Park (Court of Appeals)
Zoning and Land Use – CUP; Lakefront Parcel
A09-1922 duCharme v. Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners (Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners)
Zoning and Land Use – Variance; Lot Size
A09-1573 Grew v. Board of Adjustment of Town of Rice Lake (St. Louis County)
Top News
- Supreme Court lets abortion pill mail delivery continue
- ‘Manhood’ class will continue at prison under DOC settlement
- D.C. Circuit questions Trump’s executive orders punishing major law firms
- Milwaukee judge denies communication restrictions for accused stalker
- Roofing subcontractor charged with workers’ comp fraud
- Israel to sue New York Times over article on rape of Palestinian detainees
- DOJ lawsuit escalates fight over discipline for Trump administration attorneys
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: Taxing issues: Court addresses property issues
- Perspectives: Daily’s 125th at ‘U’ recalls varied cases
- Commentary: Will SCOTUS rule on general warrants and 4th Amendment?
- Perspectives: Law Day: Notable Supreme Court quotes
