Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

DOJ hires immigration judges with enforcement backgrounds

Reuters//March 13, 2026//

Federal immigration officers wait for respondents in a hallway to conduct targeted detainments at U.S. immigration court in New York City on Jan. 14, 2026

Federal immigration officers wait for respondents in a hallway to conduct targeted detainments at U.S. immigration court in New York City on Jan. 14, 2026. (Reuters file photo)

DOJ hires immigration judges with enforcement backgrounds

Reuters//March 13, 2026//

Listen to this article
In Brief
  • Justice Department swears in 42 new to serve in courts across 17 states.
  • Many appointees have backgrounds in , prosecution, or the Department of Homeland Security.
  • Hiring follows the removal or departure of more than 100 immigration judges since 2025.
  • Immigration courts face a backlog of about 3.2 million cases, prompting the administration’s push to reshape the system.

The Justice Department has hired 42 new immigration judges, many with backgrounds in immigration enforcement, as President Donald Trump’s administration moves to reshape the immigration court system by restocking its ranks with people it dubs “deportation judges.”

The Justice Department’s said a new class of immigration judges was sworn in on Wednesday to serve in immigration courts in 17 states including California, Florida, New York, New Jersey and Texas.

The hires are part of a broader push by the to bring immigration courts into closer alignment with its hardline deportation policies, replacing judges it has fired or pushed out with appointees who largely have backgrounds in prosecution or immigration enforcement.

Immigration judges are not part of the federal judiciary but instead work as part of the Justice Department. The Trump administration has taken the position that the president and Attorney General Pam Bondi have the constitutional right to remove immigration judges as inferior officers.

The 42 new judges come on top of 20 other permanent hires the Justice Department has announced since October. It has also brought on dozens of temporary judges, many with military backgrounds, who can serve up to six months, after firing more than 100 judges since Trump took office last year.

The latest hires also include several judges with military backgrounds. More commonly, however, they share experience as prosecutors or in immigration enforcement.

More than a third previously worked on immigration matters at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, with several coming straight from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, where they worked as lawyers.

The new hires will begin to replace the at least 104 immigration judges who have been fired since January 2025 and an almost equal number that have taken buyouts, resigned or retired since then out of a total of approximately 700 judges, according to the National Association of Immigration Judges.

Those judges are being brought on as the immigration courts face a backlog of about 3.2 million cases as of December 31, according to data from Mobile Pathways, a nonprofit that analyzes immigration court data and promotes access to justice for immigrants.

“This has made reducing the a top priority, and these 42 new highly qualified judges will help us deliver on that goal,” Bondi said in a statement. “Under the Trump Administration, immigration judges will decide cases based on the law — not politics.”

A few of the newly installed judges have publicly aligned themselves with Trump’s hardline approach to immigration.

Among them is Kieran Lalor, who will serve as an immigration judge in Ulster Immigration Court in New York. While an elected Republican lawmaker in the New York Assembly, he took several positions consistent with Trump’s immigration agenda.

In a 2017 op-ed in the Poughkeepsie Journal, he criticized the allocation of $10 million in a budget enacted under then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that would be used to fund “illegal immigrants’ lawyers to fight deportation.”

“New Yorkers fund ICE as federal taxpayers,” Lalor wrote. “Albany shouldn’t ask them to also fund the lawbreakers.”

Top News

See All Top News

Legal calendar

Click here to see upcoming Minnesota events

Expert Testimony

See All Expert Testimony