Free Newsletter
Medical Malpractice – Expert Disclosures
cassiejohnson//July 28, 2014//
Listen to this article
On appeal from dismissal of her medical malpractice action, appellant argued that the District Court erred in determining that Minn. Stat. sec. 145.682, subd. 6(c), governing the filing of affidavits of expert disclosure, is subject to the filing deadlines set forth in rule of general practice 115.03. The Court of Appeals held that a curative expert affidavit filed by a medical malpractice plaintiff under the safe harbor provision of Minnesota Statute sec. 145.682, subd. 6(c) is not subject to the filing deadlines detailed in general rule of practice 115.03. Reversed and remanded.
A13-1919 Pfeiffer v. Allina Health Sys. (Ramsey County)
Related Articles
Top News
- Justices: Hearsay doesn’t derail murder conviction
- Pirro will not appeal judge’s quashing of Fed subpoenas
- DOJ sues to block Minnesota’s climate change lawsuit
- U.S. Supreme Court lets abortion pill mail delivery restart for now
- As Thomas hits milestone, his conservative stamp on court endures
- Amid leaks, Gorsuch says court needs room for ‘candid conversations’
- BridgeTower Media names Sandy Almendarez vice president of content
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: Daily’s 125th at ‘U’ recalls varied cases
- Commentary: Will SCOTUS rule on general warrants and 4th Amendment?
- Perspectives: Law Day: Notable Supreme Court quotes
- Commentary: What can we learn from a secret act of judicial tyranny?
