Free Newsletter
Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile – Public Safety
admin//September 18, 2013//
Listen to this article
Appellant challenged the District Court’s designation of his prosecution as an extended jurisdiction juvenile (EJJ) prosecution, arguing that the court clearly erred by finding that the EJJ designation serves public safety. The Court of Appeals reviewed the six factors for EJJ designation and found that the District Court did not err. Affirmed.
A13-0513 In re Welfare of M.K.T. (Hennepin County)
Top News
- Court rejects church liability in online sexual abuse suit
- DOJ charges 15 in Minnesota with conspiracy to block ICE
- DOJ brings new criminal charge in deadly Key Bridge collapse probe
- D.C. groups sue over Trump’s planned ‘Garden of American Heroes’
- Supreme Court to review immigrant detention; other cases turned away
- Trump to tap former defense team member for Manhattan prosecutor post
- Family sues Milwaukee over 2023 death of teen left in tow lot for days
Expert Testimony
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- Perspectives: Key figure’s recent death recalls Watergate here
- Perspectives: Two new cases here recall Miranda at 60
- Perspectives: Election litigation starting early in Minnesota
