Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Discovery – Source Code

admin//January 10, 2011//

Discovery – Source Code

admin//January 10, 2011//

Listen to this article

District Court erred by refusing to grant of the Intoxilyzer Source Code.  Defendant provided threshold showing of relevancy with expert testimony that a software problem could have caused the Intoxilyzer not to register defendant’s breath sample.

Reversed and remanded.

A10-0749 Hansen v. Commissioner of Public Safety (Crow Wing County)

Click for Full Text

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Top News

See All Top News

Legal calendar

Click here to see upcoming Minnesota events

Expert Testimony

See All Expert Testimony