Court of Appeals revives fire restoration lawsuit
The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled post-fire repairs aren’t necessarily property improvements, applying a six-year statute of limitations to a homeowner’s claims.
Court: Employers not liable for hiring decisions after charges
The U.S. District Court for Minnesota ruled employers are not liable for rescinding offers or terminating employment after criminal charges were dismissed.
Forensic expert not credible, court finds
On April 18, 2016, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed Judge Bush’s order, relying on Lanterman’s testimony to do so. From this fact it can be inferred that the appellate court found Lanterman’s testimony credible. "Lanterman’s testimony established that CFS’s damages from Afremov’s breach of contract included lost payments for computer run-time and flat-rate fees as well as analy[...]
Promissory Estoppel – Clear & Definite Promise
A11-2039 Heffron v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. (Kandiyohi County)
Promissory Estoppel – Clear & Definite Promise
A11-1682 Barriball v. Langer (Hennepin County)
Promissory Estoppel – Employer’s Policy Manuals
A11-1746 Barker v. County of Lyon (Lyon County)
Top News
- Who is liable when AI goes rogue? Lawyers see new risks
- Trump says he’ll bring ballroom fight to Supreme Court after lower court halts work
- Trump tries new tack against birthright citizenship after Supreme Court snub
- Justices void contractor’s lien, deny legal fees in construction suit
- Judicial Branch announces death of OLPR’S Humiston
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: Taylor-Travis marriage recalls prenup laws here
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Fast-Tracking Temporary Lawyer Suspensions
- Perspectives: ‘Slam’ suits: Recalling wrestling cases as WWE arrives
- Best At Work Insights: We tore out the workforce backup generator












.png)


