Free Newsletter
Recent Articles from admin
Anoka Hennepin School sued, T-Paw in trouble over ad, and Football? Maybe
Where a state’s natural resources agency sought the disclosure of farmland data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the District Court properly found that the 2008 Farm Bill was a ...
Supreme Court Digest – July 25
These opinions were released by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on July 20. They will appear in the July 25 print edition of Minnesota Lawyer.
Court of Appeals Digest – July 18
These opinions were released by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on July 18. They will appear in the July 25 print edition of Minnesota Lawyer.
Court of Appeals Digest – July 11
These opinions were released by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on July 11. They will appear in the July 18 print edition of Minnesota Lawyer.
Supreme Court Digest – July 13
These opinions were released by the Minnesota Supreme Court on July 13. They will appear in the July 18 print edition of Minnesota Lawyer.
Domestic Relations – Child Support; Modification
A10-1792 Callahan v. Jobin (Carver County)
2010’s job prospects not great, DADT no more, and more
Where a state’s natural resources agency sought the disclosure of farmland data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the District Court properly found that the 2008 Farm Bill was a ...
Supreme Court Digest – July 6
These opinions were released by the Minnesota Supreme Court on July 6. They will appear in the July 11 print edition of Minnesota Lawyer.
Court of Appeals Digest – July 5
These opinions were released by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on July 5. They will appear in the July 11 print edition of Minnesota Lawyer.
Negligence – Medical Malpractice; Causation; Expert Testimony
Smith v. Bubak, et al., appealed from the District of South Dakota, Melloy, J.
Employer – Employee – Retaliation; Disability; Cat’s Paw Theory
10-1472 Diaz v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., Appealed from the Southern District of Iowa, Marshall, D.J.
Civil Practice – Consent Judgment; Intervention of Right; Telecommunications Act
10-2412 St. Charles Tower, Inc. v. Kurtz, et al., appealed from the Eastern District of Missouri, Gruender, J.
Legal Tech
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
- Are AI prompts privileged? Time will tell
Top News
- Blanche to face skeptics in GOP after judge’s scathing criticism
- U.S. Supreme Court justices testify on Capitol Hill as threats to judges surge
- Minnesota to receive $850,000 in CVS billing settlement
- DOJ shares Metro Surge shooting evidence with state
- Milwaukee judges banning AI glasses in court as privacy concerns grow
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: It’s not ‘football’ here, but soccer cases abound
- AI prompts used by experts may be discoverable
- Perspectives: 250th anniversary recalls Declaration decisions
- Perspectives: ‘Pentagon Papers’ case at 55 not far from Near
