Free Newsletter
Discovery – Compelling Production
hannahhoffman//March 19, 2014//
The County moved for an order requiring petitioner to respond to its discovery without further delay after petitioner repeatedly failed to respond to valid discovery requests. Petitioner filed no opposition to the County’s motion. Based upon the evidence filed by the County, the Tax Court granted the County’s motion to compel, ordered petitioner to fully respond to the County’s discovery requests by the end of the month, and ordered petitioner to pay the County’s attorney fees.
55-CV-11-3146, 55-CV-12-2904 Menard, Inc. v. County of Olmsted
Related Content
Legal Tech
- Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms
- Lawyers continue to grapple with AI ethical issues
- Are AI prompts privileged? Time will tell
Top News
- Blanche to face skeptics in GOP after judge’s scathing criticism
- U.S. Supreme Court justices testify on Capitol Hill as threats to judges surge
- Minnesota to receive $850,000 in CVS billing settlement
- DOJ shares Metro Surge shooting evidence with state
- Milwaukee judges banning AI glasses in court as privacy concerns grow
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: It’s not ‘football’ here, but soccer cases abound
- AI prompts used by experts may be discoverable
- Perspectives: 250th anniversary recalls Declaration decisions
- Perspectives: ‘Pentagon Papers’ case at 55 not far from Near
