14-CV-12-1500, 14-CV-13-1454, 14-CV-13-1405, 14-CV-14-1352 Menard, Inc. v. County of Clay

27-CV-10-10145, 27-CV-11-09054 Archway Mktg. Servs. v. County of Hennepin

A15-0018 KCP Hastings, LLC v. County of Dakota (Tax Court)

A14-1883, A14-2168 Guardian Energy, LLC v. County of Waseca (Tax Court)

70-CV-11-8148, 70-CV-11-24964, 70-CV-13-8725, 70-CV-14-5741 Certain Teed Corp. v. County of Scott

01-CV-11-375 et al. Blandin Paper Co. v. County of Aitkin

A proposed compromise at the Capitol would allow Rochester to tap a pair of local sales taxes rather than resort to a property tax hike to cover costs associated with the Destination Medical Center.

A legislative fix for Destination Medical Center spending faltered, fanning concerns that Rochester could have to find additional funding streams down the line – possibly though a property tax hike affecting its 110,742 residents.

27-CV-11-06077, 27-CV-12-05686, 27-CV-13-07180 Lone Oak Rogers, L.L.C. v. County of Hennepin

70-CV-12-8404 Sadat v. County of Scott