Free Newsletter
Civil Procedure – Service of Process
A09-2245 Becker v. Duluth Transit Authority (St. Louis County)
Civil Procedure – Minimum Contacts
A09-1882 Knitcraft Corp. v. Daswani Clothiers, LLC (Winona County)
Civil Procedure – Pleadings; Corporate Name
A09-1893 Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. (Isanti County)
Civil Procedure – Costs/Disbursements; Sovereign Immunity
A08-1408 Lund, Jr. v. Commissioner of Public Safety (Court of Appeals)
Civil Procedure – Diversity; Foreign Corporation
Where a process server for a personal injury plaintiff served two officers of a private management company that manages the Duluth Transit Authority rather than a member of the DTA board as statutorily required, service was not perfected and the action was properly dismissed. The DTA’s actual knowledge of the suit or the fact that ...
Civil Procedure – Closing Argument; Time Limitation
Where a process server for a personal injury plaintiff served two officers of a private management company that manages the Duluth Transit Authority rather than a member of the DTA board as statutorily required, service was not perfected and the action was properly dismissed. The DTA’s actual knowledge of the suit or the fact that ...
Civil Procedure – Vacating Default Judgment
Where a process server for a personal injury plaintiff served two officers of a private management company that manages the Duluth Transit Authority rather than a member of the DTA board as statutorily required, service was not perfected and the action was properly dismissed. The DTA’s actual knowledge of the suit or the fact that ...
Civil Procedure – Discovery Sanctions
Where a process server for a personal injury plaintiff served two officers of a private management company that manages the Duluth Transit Authority rather than a member of the DTA board as statutorily required, service was not perfected and the action was properly dismissed. The DTA’s actual knowledge of the suit or the fact that ...
Civil Procedure – Amendments to Rules
Where a process server for a personal injury plaintiff served two officers of a private management company that manages the Duluth Transit Authority rather than a member of the DTA board as statutorily required, service was not perfected and the action was properly dismissed. The DTA’s actual knowledge of the suit or the fact that ...
Civil Procedure – Motion to Vacate Judgment
Where a process server for a personal injury plaintiff served two officers of a private management company that manages the Duluth Transit Authority rather than a member of the DTA board as statutorily required, service was not perfected and the action was properly dismissed. The DTA’s actual knowledge of the suit or the fact that ...
Civil Procedure – Vouching; Indemnification
Where a process server for a personal injury plaintiff served two officers of a private management company that manages the Duluth Transit Authority rather than a member of the DTA board as statutorily required, service was not perfected and the action was properly dismissed. The DTA’s actual knowledge of the suit or the fact that ...
Civil Procedure – Dismissal after Summary Judgment
Where a process server for a personal injury plaintiff served two officers of a private management company that manages the Duluth Transit Authority rather than a member of the DTA board as statutorily required, service was not perfected and the action was properly dismissed. The DTA’s actual knowledge of the suit or the fact that ...
Top News
- Minnesota artists consider what’s next in AI copyrights
- Defining ‘and’ in sentencing statute falls to Supreme Court
- Hashtag rates higher libel protection
- Court: Performance issues, not bias, prompted union to fire organizer
- Robot milker case yields $122M
- 2023 Up & Coming Attorneys
- 2023 Unsung Legal Heroes
- Appeals court takes up transgender health coverage case
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: Oral arguments at high court stir lively debates
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Advance waivers: Lessons from Paul Hastings vs. Coca Cola
- Perspectives: Recent cellphone ruling recalls high court cases
- The Unfrazzled Lawyer: Supercharge your unfrazzled lawyer efforts
