The Justice Department has set new dates to begin executing federal death-row inmates following a monthslong legal battle over the plan to resume the executions for the first time since 2003.
Read More »Judge: U.S. must release $679M in tribal virus relief funds
The U.S. Treasury Department must release $679 million in coronavirus relief funding for tribes that it intended to withhold while a court challenge over the agency’s initial round of payments to tribal governments played out in court, a federal judge ruled.
Read More »DFL-led panel OKs sweeping police reforms
After 13 hours of special session hearings over two days, the DFL-led House Public Safety committee on Monday passed three mini-omnibus bills that constitute a sweeping police-reform package.
Read More »Quandaries and Quagmires: Champerty? No. Third-party litigation finance? Yes.
Abolition of champerty may well increase the frequency of litigation financing. Minnesota lawyers will have to be alert to several ethics issues.
Read More »Supreme Court upholds paid sick leave
The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce had challenged Minneapolis' "Sick and Safe Time" law.
Read More »Capitol Retort: Cop-shop chop; Ellison in charge; woe is Wolves
Our review of issues in state and national news, with a rotating cast of political people in the know.
Read More »Mariani: World is watching Minnesota Capitol
The DFL House leader wants the special session to tackle police reform.
Read More »Bar Buzz: Courthouse service counters reopening
Every District Court in all of Minnesota’s counties, and all state-level appellate courts, must open at least one public service counter by June 15.
Read More »Perspectives: Search cases warrant rival rulings recently
A pair of cases decided this spring by the Minnesota Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals upheld challenges to searches by government authorities.
Read More »Pandemic means a silent June at the Supreme Court
Thanks to the coronavirus, instead of the drama that can accompany the announcement of a majority decision and its biting dissent, the court’s opinions are being posted online without an opportunity for the justices to be heard.
Read More »