“Peterson … argues that the phrase ‘buildings, structures and improvements’ merely modifies ‘real property,’ so that a person who owns a building, structure or improvement ...
Read More »00-1086 State v. Raflik
“Where there is no evidence of intentional or reckless misconduct on the part of law enforcement officers, a reconstructed warrant application may serve as a ...
Read More »00-3473 Downey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
“[T]he possibility of suit directly against the Director is created not by our decision but by the language of sec.4072 itself. It is an option, ...
Read More »01-1934 Rendler v. Corus Bank
“Rendler requests this court to interpret the TILA as requiring a lender to provide a single document to a borrower, that reflects the total cost ...
Read More »98-2172, 98-2375, 98-2376, 98-2377, 98-2378, 98-2379, 98-2381 and 00-2893 Bishop, et al. v. Gainer, et al.
“In this case, the class won a victory. The court found that the class was discriminated against in the first of seven steps required for ...
Read More »01-1930 Collins v. NTN-Bower Corporation, et al.
“Sometimes absence is required by an event that could not be predicted: for example, a family member who dies unexpectedly. That is not Collins’s situation. ...
Read More »00-3922 Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Hunt Truck Lines, Inc.
“[I]n the broader context of this litigation, an award of fees would do nothing but encourage the very foot-dragging and avoidance of interim payment liability ...
Read More »01-1726 Hoyte-Mesa v. Ashcroft
“Although Hoyte was adjudicated excludable, he was subsequently granted parole into the United States with certain conditions, including compliance with our laws. His breach of ...
Read More »01-1275 Lockwood International v. Volm Bag Company, Inc.
“No case that has been cited to us or that our own research has uncovered authorizes so convoluted a mode of proceeding. To recapitulate: North ...
Read More »00-3783 U.S. v. Collins
“[The defendant] submits that these provisions are void under the vagueness doctrine because the statute fails to define ‘knowingly or intentionally … to possess with ...
Read More »