Minnesota Lawyer

It’s clear that the drums are beating — and judicial war over abortion is coming, like it or not.

You practically need a scorecard to keep up with all the conflicts between Congress and President Donald Trump.

Next month will mark the 65th anniversary of one of the most craven moments in Harvard’s storied history.

The Georgia law bans abortion after a doctor can detect a fetal heartbeat.

There’s something dissatisfying about blaming a scorpion for being a scorpion.

Roberts, the likely swing voter, seems inclined to take a different path.

Does the ban on workplace discrimination based on “sex,” as laid out in Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity? U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to take up both questions in its October 2019 term. It’s potentially a big moment for LGBT rights.

Forced vaccination is a classic instance of a situation where the courts have to balance individual liberties against the public interest.

Can Assange be lawfully prosecuted for somehow facilitating illegal theft of classified information? Or is the organization he founded, WikiLeaks, protected by the First Amendment when it publishes documents supplied by others, like the New York Times when it published the Pentagon Papers?

What’s really at stake is whether and how the Supreme Court should engage with what the late Justice Harry Blackmun memorably called “the machinery of death.”