Minnesota Lawyer
Property Taxation
Judgment
Pro se petitioners moved to vacate an earlier order dismissing their petition, and moved for recusal of the assigned judge, without an accompanying affidavit, and without reciting any facts, alleging disqualification under the Code of Judicial Conduct. Noting petitioners contended the order was “jurisdictionally null” and “void,” but did not identify a specific procedural or substantive basis for their motion to vacate the dismissal order, the Tax Court denied the motion to vacate and the motion for recusal.
27-CV-21-2304 Johnson v. County of Hennepin
