Free Newsletter
Ethics Scorecard: March decisions from the Minnesota Supreme Court
Minnesota Lawyer//March 22, 2018
Benched
Henline III, Roy: Respondent is disbarred. No date of reinstatement was specified.
Klotz, Adam William: Respondent is indefinitely suspended with no right to petition for reinstatement for 18 months. The court noted the existence of substantial mitigating factors
Koch, Scott: Respondent is publicly reprimanded and placed on two years probation.
Olson, Jeffrey: Respondent is disbarred.
Related Content
Top News
- Melodie Rose named president at Fredrikson
- Supreme Court lawyers have rituals of their own
- Minnesota artists consider what’s next in AI copyrights
- Defining ‘and’ in sentencing statute falls to Supreme Court
- Hashtag rates higher libel protection
- Court: Performance issues, not bias, prompted union to fire organizer
- Robot milker case yields $122M
- 2023 Up & Coming Attorneys
Expert Testimony
- Briefly: A chat with Supreme Court Commissioner Tim Droske
- Perspectives: Oral arguments at high court stir lively debates
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Advance waivers: Lessons from Paul Hastings vs. Coca Cola
- Perspectives: Recent cellphone ruling recalls high court cases
