Free Newsletter
SENTENCING Supervised Release; Revocation
cassiejohnson//December 4, 2015//
Listen to this article
Where a defendant challenged the 24-month sentence that he received following the revocation of his supervised release, the defendant did not show that the district court erred in weighing the sentencing factors, and although the sentence was greater than the advisory guidelines range, the defendant did not show that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. Judgment is affirmed.
15-1331 U.S. v. Boelter, a Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska, per curiam.
Top News
- Federal court rules brokerage firm breached 1994 contract
- Court denies revocation of adoption
- UnitedHealth suit alleges faulty AI led to denied claims
- Judge asked to block part of a North Dakota abortion law
- Court dismisses bias, retaliation lawsuit
- Joint-employer rule set to roil workplace — once again
- 8th Circuit rules private plaintiffs can’t sue under Voting Rights Act
- Commentary: Right-to-repair fight centers on data transmitted by newer cars
Expert Testimony
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Risky business and tips for managing the risk
- Perspectives: JFK assassination: 60 years of litigation here
- Perspectives: Lincoln’s memorable address recalls impact here
- The Unfrazzled Lawyer: Five benefits of becoming an unfrazzled lawyer
