Minnesota Lawyer
Where an immigrant worker from India challenged the revocation of an I-140 petition arguing that the petition was revoked without disclosure of the basis for revocation as required, district courts lack jurisdiction to consider whether the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services failed to comply with disclosure requirements, so the claim was properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the worker was also not statutorily eligible to adjust status. Judgment is affirmed.
14-3623 Rajasekaran v. Hazuda , appealed from the District of Nebraska, Benton, J.
