Free Newsletter
Probation Revocation Inexcusable Violations
cassiejohnson//November 20, 2015
Appellant challenged the District Court’s decision to revoke the stay of execution on his sentence. Appellant’s probation was revoked after he failed to complete sex-offender treatment, failed to complete transitional housing, and failed to keep probation informed of his residence. The Court of Appeals concluded that the probation violation hearing transcript contained ample support for its conclusion that appellant’s violations were inexcusable. Affirmed.
A15-0238 State v. Young (Ramsey County)
Top News
- Minnesota artists consider what’s next in AI copyrights
- Defining ‘and’ in sentencing statute falls to Supreme Court
- Hashtag rates higher libel protection
- Court: Performance issues, not bias, prompted union to fire organizer
- Robot milker case yields $122M
- 2023 Up & Coming Attorneys
- 2023 Unsung Legal Heroes
- Appeals court takes up transgender health coverage case
Expert Testimony
- Perspectives: Oral arguments at high court stir lively debates
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Advance waivers: Lessons from Paul Hastings vs. Coca Cola
- Perspectives: Recent cellphone ruling recalls high court cases
- The Unfrazzled Lawyer: Supercharge your unfrazzled lawyer efforts
