Minnesota Lawyer
Appellant state challenged the District Court’s order modifying the expiration of respondent’s conditional-release term. The Court of Appeals concluded that appellant’s motion to correct a sentence under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, was an improper procedure to obtain judicial review of the Department of Correction’s administrative decision. Reversed.
A13-2362 State v. Ihnot (Anoka County)
