Minnesota Lawyer
In an appeal following an award for summary judgment in this declaratory-judgment action, appellant sought to recover on its Miller-Shugart settlement of the underlying lawsuit against the insured for negligent design, contending that the insured’s policy covered negligent design services. The Court of Appeals concluded that the design services provision did not apply because the drafting services were not performed for work “completed by [an] insured.” Affirmed.
A15-0113 Diseworth at Somerby v. W. Nat’l Mut. Ins. Co. (Scott County)
