Minnesota Lawyer
Where a defendant in a child pornography case challenged his 720-month sentence, the district court read the presentence investigation report, which shows the court considered the statutory factors, and further statements by the court show that it considered but gave little weight to the defendant’s history and characteristics, so no procedural error was shown, and the sentence was not substantively unreasonable compared to a similar case and based on the seriousness of the defendant’s crimes. Judgment is affirmed.
14-2912 U.S. v. Smith, appealed from Eastern District of Missouri, per curiam.
