Where an administrative law judge found that a claimant of Social Security disability benefits and supplemental security income was not disabled because he could perform a job a vocational expert identified in response to the ALJ’s hypothetical, from the record the appellate court could not determine whether there was a conflict between the occupational listing at issue and the expert’s response to the hypothetical, so the case is remanded for further proceedings. Vacated; remanded.
13-1421 Kemp v. Colvin, appealed from Eastern District of Arkansas, Bye, J.