Free Newsletter
Asylum; Timeliness; Withholding Of Removal
Web Admin//June 9, 2008//
Listen to this articleWhere petitioners from Hungary failed to apply for asylum within one year of entering the United States and failed to show extraordinary circumstances excusing the failure, the petitioners were ineligible for asylum, and substantial evidence supported the finding that petitioners also failed to show past persecution to support a withholding of removal even though they showed that their status as gypsies resulted in “pervasive countrywide discrimination.” Petitions for review denied.
Related Content
Top News
- Federal court rules brokerage firm breached 1994 contract
- Court denies revocation of adoption
- UnitedHealth suit alleges faulty AI led to denied claims
- Judge asked to block part of a North Dakota abortion law
- Court dismisses bias, retaliation lawsuit
- Joint-employer rule set to roil workplace — once again
- 8th Circuit rules private plaintiffs can’t sue under Voting Rights Act
- Commentary: Right-to-repair fight centers on data transmitted by newer cars
Expert Testimony
- Quandaries & Quagmires: Risky business and tips for managing the risk
- Perspectives: JFK assassination: 60 years of litigation here
- Perspectives: Lincoln’s memorable address recalls impact here
- The Unfrazzled Lawyer: Five benefits of becoming an unfrazzled lawyer
