Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Recent News
Home / Opinions / 00-2495, 00-2701 U.S. v. Elem

00-2495, 00-2701 U.S. v. Elem

"In this case, the inconsistencies between Anderson's grand jury testimony and his trial testimony do not undermine the legitimacy of the jury's verdict for several reasons. First, the main purpose of Anderson's testimony at trial was to identify Jennings and Elem as his accomplices. While Anderson may have mistaken minor details, nothing in Anderson's grand ...

Leave a Reply