Brian W. Cantwell appeals from a judgment convicting him of theft, and from an order denying postconviction relief. His original judgment of conviction contained a sentencing provision the trial court subsequently clarified. The issue is whether the clarification actually increased the original sentence, and thus violated Cantwell’s double jeopardy protections.
We conclude it did not, and therefore affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist IV, Dane County, Bartell, J., Per Curiam
For Appellant: Bruce J. Rosen, Madison; Susan C. Blesener, Madison
For Respondent: David J. Becker, Madison; Ann Sayles, Madison