Quantcast
Home / Opinions / No. 130, Orig., New Hampshire v. Maine

No. 130, Orig., New Hampshire v. Maine

"New Hampshire's claim that the Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore is clearly inconsistent with its interpretation of the words 'Middle of the River' during the 1970's litigation... [I]nterpretation of those words was 'necessary' to fixing the northern endpoint of the lateral marine boundary, Report 43. New Hampshire offered two interpretations in the ...

About Minnesota Lawyer

Leave a Reply