Home / Opinions / 99-2317Tayborn v. Scott

99-2317Tayborn v. Scott

"Tayborn argues that several inconsistencies in his testimony rendered his testimony perjurious and that the prosecution should have known it was perjurious. However, Tayborn only points to collateral inconsistencies in Murchinson's testimony like: 1) whether he heard a noise before looking down from the porch to see the attackers; 2) whether he gave the police ...

About Minnesota Lawyer

Leave a Reply