<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota Lawyer &#187; Employer-employee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnlawyer.com/tag/employer-employee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnlawyer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Employer- Employee – Diversity Jurisdiction; Minnesota Law&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/05/20/employer-employee-diversity-jurisdiction-minnesota-law/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/05/20/employer-employee-diversity-jurisdiction-minnesota-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=68241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12-1058 Chavez-Lavagnino v. Motivation Education Training, Inc. appealed from the District of Minnesota, Colloton J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/05/20/employer-employee-diversity-jurisdiction-minnesota-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer-Employee – Administrative Leave; Epileptic Seizures; Age Discrimination&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/05/15/employer-employee-administrative-leave-epileptic-seizures-age-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/05/15/employer-employee-administrative-leave-epileptic-seizures-age-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=68047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12-2113 Olsen v. Capital Region Medical Center, appealed from Western District of Missouri, Smith, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/05/15/employer-employee-administrative-leave-epileptic-seizures-age-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer-Employee – MHRA; Retaliation; Attorney’s Fees&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/20/employer-employee-mhra-retaliation-attorneys-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/20/employer-employee-mhra-retaliation-attorneys-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=66598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[08-3780/09-1091 Al-Birekdar v. Chrysler Group, LLC, appealed from Eastern District of Missouri, Melloy, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/20/employer-employee-mhra-retaliation-attorneys-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer-Employee – Discrimination; Mental Anguish; Sufficiency of Evidence&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/20/employer-employee-discrimination-mental-anguish-sufficiency-of-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/20/employer-employee-discrimination-mental-anguish-sufficiency-of-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=66596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12-2572 Hudson v. United Systems of Arkansas, Inc., appealed from Eastern District of Arkansas, Murphy, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/20/employer-employee-discrimination-mental-anguish-sufficiency-of-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer-Employee – Whistleblower Action; Discrimination; Railroad Employer&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/11/employer-employee-whistleblower-action-discrimination-railroad-employer/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/11/employer-employee-whistleblower-action-discrimination-railroad-employer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=66407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12-1041 Hohn v. BNSF Railway Company, appealed from District of Nebraska, Wollman, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/03/11/employer-employee-whistleblower-action-discrimination-railroad-employer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer–Employee – Retaliation; Minnesota Law&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/25/employer-employee-retaliation-minnesota-law/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/25/employer-employee-retaliation-minnesota-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=65951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12-1712 Wood v. SatCom Marketing, LLC, appealed from District of Minnesota, Bye, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/25/employer-employee-retaliation-minnesota-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer-Employee – Wrongful Termination; ADA; Causation&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/18/employer-employee-wrongful-termination-ada-causation/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/18/employer-employee-wrongful-termination-ada-causation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=65607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12-1211 Lenzen v. Workers Compensation Reinsurance Association, appealed from District of Minnesota, Loken, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/18/employer-employee-wrongful-termination-ada-causation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer-Employee – MHRA, Punitive Damages, Attorney’s Fees&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-mhra-punitive-damages-attorneys-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-mhra-punitive-damages-attorneys-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lindsey.petkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=65424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12-1061/12-1177 Trickey v. Kaman Industrial Technologies Corp., appealed from Eastern District of Missouri, Smith, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-mhra-punitive-damages-attorneys-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer- Employee – FMLA, Notice&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-fmla-notice/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-fmla-notice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lindsey.petkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=65422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12-1290 Bosley v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, appealed from Southern District of Iowa, Smith, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-fmla-notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer-Employee – ADA, Capacity to be Sued, South Dakota Law&#160;</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-ada-capacity-to-be-sued-south-dakota-law/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-ada-capacity-to-be-sued-south-dakota-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lindsey.petkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Civil Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer-employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/?p=65420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11-3626 Lundquist v. University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, appealed from District of South Dakota, Loken, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2013/02/08/employer-employee-ada-capacity-to-be-sued-south-dakota-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
