Feed on
Posts
Comments

Category Archive for 'Coleman v. Franken'

Anderson returns to strict compliance

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

Read Full Post »

Friedberg turns argument to substantial compliance

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

Read Full Post »

Is voter reliance on procedure necessary?

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

Read Full Post »

Friedberg: Discrimination doesn't have to be intentional

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

“We do identify each and every ballot. The picture is there,” Friedberg says, tapping on the podium for emphasis. Justice Page is going back to the counting on election night. How does that become a due process or equal protection problem? If all the voters had voted in Minneapolis, there would be half as many [...]

Read Full Post »

Coleman's offer of proof bothers justices

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

Dietzen and Anderson are questioning the offer of proof at the trial stage. Dietzen appears to say Friedberg’s offer was inadequate because he didn’t identify the witness. “You’re offering a little more than an offering statement but no concrete evidence to back it up.” Friedberg directs the court to the exhibits. Anderson says he is [...]

Read Full Post »

Friedberg–the court didn't hear evidence of election judges

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

Justice Christopher Dietzen has got Friedberg to say the election judges didn’t violate any law. Doesn’t that give the court a problem saying the trial judges findings were clearly erroneous? Friedberg is responding that the conclusions of law — excluding evidence of what election judges did –drove the findings of fact.Justice Gildea just asked for [...]

Read Full Post »

Friedberg: The constitutional claims are heart of case

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

Read Full Post »

Page kicks off questioning

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

Read Full Post »

Franken-Coleman: in the starting gate

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009

Read Full Post »

D-Day for the Coleman-Franken Senate seat dispute

Posted in Coleman v. Franken on May 31st, 2009

The eyes of the nation are trained on the Minnesota Supreme Court, where the senatorial battle of the century is entering what may very well be its final leg. Barring the intercession of the of the U.S. Supreme Court, the Minnesota appellate court will have the final word on whether Al Franken should be seated [...]

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts