Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
It was an interesting argument. Both sides were questioned extensively by all of the justices and I didn’t get a clear indication from the questions where the court would go with this. Some of the justices expressed concern over Coleman’s offers of proof or lack thereof, while others focused on the correct standard to apply [...]
Read Full Post »
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
Friedberg on rebuttal is telling the court he tried to get the evidence of ballot problems in and tried to the point of trying the court’s patience but couldn’t get it in. Dietzen is going back to the offer of proof.The feed is jerky here. Friedberg is returning to the argument that a few demonstrated [...]
Read Full Post »
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
On rebuttal, Friedberg continues to point to specific instances where absentee ballots were treated differently in different counties.
Read Full Post »
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
Elias argues that for there to be a problem with the election system there must be a complete absence of any effort to comply with the requirements of the absentee voter statute. There is nothing in trial court’s findings that show that level of a problem, he said.
Read Full Post »
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
As expected, Franken’s attorney, Marc Elias, is sticking pretty closely to the correctness of the trial court’s findings and conclusions. In response to a question byJustice Paul Anderson, he argues that equal protection and due process are not violated unless there’s been a showing of extraordinary fundamental unfairness in the process, which is not the [...]
Read Full Post »
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009
Posted in Coleman v. Franken on Jun 1st, 2009