<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MinnLawyer Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog//comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog</link>
	<description>If it’s legal, you can discuss it here</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 8th Circuit strikes down judicial campaign restrictions by Sharon Scarrella Anderson</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/29/8th-circuit-strikes-down-judicial-campaign-restrictions/#comment-4806</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Scarrella Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2550#comment-4806</guid>
		<description>http://minnlawyer.com/wp-files/blog-folder/wersal.pdf
Mucho Thanks to Greg Wersal is not fighting alone
In re:Scarrella4Justice 221NW2d562 Published by Judicial Tryanny without Royalitys to circumvent MN Const. Art. III Separation of Powers,  Voting Rights Act  Eligible to Vote then and therefore Eligible for ANY OFFICE.
 Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_1st Husband Scarrella for Quiet Titles Search is the only Certified Sane Candidate for MN Attorney General
www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com  on the Graves of Tenants in Common and Murder of 2nd Husband www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com  Sharons Quo Warranto at www.taxthemax.blogspot.com    We must have Decency,Morality,Judicial Reform 4 Accountability in Government    Sharon opposes ShariaLaw_We must Repeal ObamaCare and or "If it aint broke don't fix it"  Medicare does not include Dental_Glasses,Hearin Aids_ Stand with AZ v. the Feds Immigration Reform.
WERSAL THE WEASAL4JUSTICE WE LOVE YOU  WE THE COMMAN PERSONS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://minnlawyer.com/wp-files/blog-folder/wersal.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://minnlawyer.com/wp-files/blog-folder/wersal.pdf</a><br />
Mucho Thanks to Greg Wersal is not fighting alone<br />
In re:Scarrella4Justice 221NW2d562 Published by Judicial Tryanny without Royalitys to circumvent MN Const. Art. III Separation of Powers,  Voting Rights Act  Eligible to Vote then and therefore Eligible for ANY OFFICE.<br />
 Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_1st Husband Scarrella for Quiet Titles Search is the only Certified Sane Candidate for MN Attorney General<br />
<a href="http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com</a>  on the Graves of Tenants in Common and Murder of 2nd Husband <a href="http://www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com</a>  Sharons Quo Warranto at <a href="http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com</a>    We must have Decency,Morality,Judicial Reform 4 Accountability in Government    Sharon opposes ShariaLaw_We must Repeal ObamaCare and or &#8220;If it aint broke don&#8217;t fix it&#8221;  Medicare does not include Dental_Glasses,Hearin Aids_ Stand with AZ v. the Feds Immigration Reform.<br />
WERSAL THE WEASAL4JUSTICE WE LOVE YOU  WE THE COMMAN PERSONS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 8th Circuit strikes down judicial campaign restrictions by Levi Swank</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/29/8th-circuit-strikes-down-judicial-campaign-restrictions/#comment-4719</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi Swank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2550#comment-4719</guid>
		<description>So the only remaining restriction is that elections must be non-partisan? Or are there other restrictions left intact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the only remaining restriction is that elections must be non-partisan? Or are there other restrictions left intact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mood lighting by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/29/mood-lighting/#comment-4713</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2547#comment-4713</guid>
		<description>I'm here to help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m here to help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mood lighting by Patrick Thornton</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/29/mood-lighting/#comment-4710</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2547#comment-4710</guid>
		<description>Yep. You're right. Correction made. He posted an edited video. Not sure who edited it. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. You&#8217;re right. Correction made. He posted an edited video. Not sure who edited it. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mood lighting by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/29/mood-lighting/#comment-4709</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2547#comment-4709</guid>
		<description>You say "soon after the video went viral, it became apparent that Breitbart edited the video to make Sherrod look, well, worse." I am curious where you learned that. How did that become apparent? I have only read that Breitbart posted a video edited by someone else, which is very different than editing a video to make her look worse. It could be that he has a legal duty to investigate whether a video's editing substantially alters its content or meaning, I don't really know. But, is this an error, or is there some evidence that Breitbart knowingly posted a video that he intentionally edited to make Sherrod look bad? If no evidence of that exists, you may want to make a correction, lest you face allegations similar to Mr. Breitbart's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;soon after the video went viral, it became apparent that Breitbart edited the video to make Sherrod look, well, worse.&#8221; I am curious where you learned that. How did that become apparent? I have only read that Breitbart posted a video edited by someone else, which is very different than editing a video to make her look worse. It could be that he has a legal duty to investigate whether a video&#8217;s editing substantially alters its content or meaning, I don&#8217;t really know. But, is this an error, or is there some evidence that Breitbart knowingly posted a video that he intentionally edited to make Sherrod look bad? If no evidence of that exists, you may want to make a correction, lest you face allegations similar to Mr. Breitbart&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Family Feud by Patrick Thornton</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/28/family-feud/#comment-4685</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2533#comment-4685</guid>
		<description>Yep. You're right. Correction made. Thanks for the heads up. A.C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. You&#8217;re right. Correction made. Thanks for the heads up. A.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Family Feud by anonymous coward</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/28/family-feud/#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2533#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>The article said he used to be law partners with Mantooth's opponents in the primary, not with Mantooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article said he used to be law partners with Mantooth&#8217;s opponents in the primary, not with Mantooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raising the bar by Maryland Family Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/27/raising-the-bar-2/#comment-4575</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryland Family Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2528#comment-4575</guid>
		<description>Makes me wonder if the bar just needs to be a little more difficult, or if we have students that grew up in a very competitive world and are ready for any challenge. The latter would be much more impressive. 
-Micah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes me wonder if the bar just needs to be a little more difficult, or if we have students that grew up in a very competitive world and are ready for any challenge. The latter would be much more impressive.<br />
-Micah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bereft of technologies, millennials vie to be Minnesota lawyers by Anne M. Hansen</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/26/bereft-of-technologies-millennials-vie-to-be-minnesota-lawyers/#comment-4567</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne M. Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2520#comment-4567</guid>
		<description>Mark -- I don't pretend to understand the tech side of these things, but hopefully the bar exam software company can catch up with the times at a reasonable cost.  It's very hard for Mac users to find a friend or family member with a spare, usable PC laptop that they can borrow for the installation and test uploading process AND one full day of essays.  

As an aside, I am very grateful to the law school classmate who let me borrow his spare laptop.  Sure I panicked when it kept crashing, but I still passed.  In the end, that's all that matters (to me, anyway!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8212; I don&#8217;t pretend to understand the tech side of these things, but hopefully the bar exam software company can catch up with the times at a reasonable cost.  It&#8217;s very hard for Mac users to find a friend or family member with a spare, usable PC laptop that they can borrow for the installation and test uploading process AND one full day of essays.  </p>
<p>As an aside, I am very grateful to the law school classmate who let me borrow his spare laptop.  Sure I panicked when it kept crashing, but I still passed.  In the end, that&#8217;s all that matters (to me, anyway!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raising the bar by Anon</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2010/07/27/raising-the-bar-2/#comment-4504</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/?p=2528#comment-4504</guid>
		<description>Nine of out ten will pass the bar, but how many will actually get attorney jobs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nine of out ten will pass the bar, but how many will actually get attorney jobs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>