<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The high court&#39;s Franken/Coleman decision at a glance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog//2009/06/30/the-high-courts-frankencoleman-decision-at-a-glance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2009/06/30/the-high-courts-frankencoleman-decision-at-a-glance/</link>
	<description>If it’s legal, you can discuss it here</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Coleman/Franken recount and the media &#171; MinnLawyer blog</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2009/06/30/the-high-courts-frankencoleman-decision-at-a-glance/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>The Coleman/Franken recount and the media &#171; MinnLawyer blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyerblog.com/?p=2985#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>[...] political hot button. A case in point is Coleman v. Frankin. Last week I put up a pretty innocuous post dissecting some of the  legalities of the Minnesota Supreme Court decision, and recieved the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] political hot button. A case in point is Coleman v. Frankin. Last week I put up a pretty innocuous post dissecting some of the  legalities of the Minnesota Supreme Court decision, and recieved the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sondra J. Katz</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2009/06/30/the-high-courts-frankencoleman-decision-at-a-glance/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Sondra J. Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyerblog.com/?p=2985#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>You are just as complicate in the Voter Fraud against Norm Coleman, as Mark Ritchie &#38; ACORN is, by not denouncing the fraud that went on with dead voters, fradulant ballots, &#38; Ritchie stacking the State Canvassaing Board against Coeman, and all the other garbage that transpired.

But, you got your liberal candidate, didn't you.  A joke &#38; embarrassament to the state of Minnesota.  You must be proud of yourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are just as complicate in the Voter Fraud against Norm Coleman, as Mark Ritchie &amp; ACORN is, by not denouncing the fraud that went on with dead voters, fradulant ballots, &amp; Ritchie stacking the State Canvassaing Board against Coeman, and all the other garbage that transpired.</p>
<p>But, you got your liberal candidate, didn&#8217;t you.  A joke &amp; embarrassament to the state of Minnesota.  You must be proud of yourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
