RSS

A brief comment on brevity

Thu, Oct 13, 2011

Archive

[Print] [Email] [RSS Feed] [Facebook] [Twitter]

Brevity is one of the cornerstones of good writing (including good legal writing, although not every lawyer takes heed).

Don’t be afraid to elaborate  if the situation calls for it, however. Some concepts simply require more words to explain than others. An article in the September issue of Bench & Bar contains this caveat to the brevity rule:

“The quest for conciseness nonetheless may raise a judgment call for lawyers and judges. Justice Joseph Story, the most prolific treatise writer in Supreme Court history, warned that sometimes ‘[b]revity becomes of itself a source of obscurity.’ Where full exposition of a legal doctrine, argument or agreement requires extended discussion, conciseness for its own sake may actually breed imprecision and compromise the sound administration of justice or the rights of clients.”

Thus, be concise, but not at the risk of obfuscating. The rule of clarity trumps the rule of brevity.

[Print] [Email] [RSS Feed] [Facebook] [Twitter]

This post was written by:

Michael Goodwin - who has written 18 posts on JDs Rising.

Michael Goodwin is an associate attorney at Jardine, Logan & O'Brien in the Twin Cities. Michael's practice involves a range of insurance defense and coverage issues. Michael currently serves as the Outreach Committee Chairperson for the Minnesota State Bar Association New Lawyers Section. He earned first place in the 2010 Levit Essay Contest, a national writing contest sponsored by the ABA Standing Committee on Lawyers’ Professional Liability and Long & Levit, LLP. Michael graduated from Hamline University School of Law in 2009. During law school he was a board member of the Hamline Law Review and he completed a judicial externship in United States District Court. A native of Sioux City, Iowa, Michael was a newspaper reporter prior to enrolling in law school.

Contact the author

Leave a Reply