RSS

What’s up, doc?… an insider’s view of doc review

Tue, Aug 31, 2010

Archive

[Print] [Email] [RSS Feed] [Facebook] [Twitter]

By Leah Weaver

It’s no secret that the legal job market right now is pretty awful. Some lawyers, unable to find a permanent job and unwilling to hang out a shingle, end up as contract attorneys: temporary help, reviewing discovery documents in complex litigation. These people spend their days looking at electronic documents on a computer screen, searching for key terms. Their work is reviewed for speed and accuracy, with the primary focus on speed.

“Jennifer” and “Howard” (pseudonyms, at their request) are two such young attorneys. After law school, neither was able to find a job, nor did they feel qualified to go into solo practice. Each has been looking for permanent employment for several years, and temping all the while. As one would expect, neither Jennifer nor Howard is especially thrilled about their current employment. The pay rate for doc review in the Twin Cities is around $23 per hour – significantly down from a few years ago, and the amount of work has dropped at the same time. Overtime used to be freely given, but is now rarely authorized. Projects are fewer, with pressure to keep them as short as possible. Portions of some review projects are sent offshore to India. Howard reported that, despite being signed up with six different agencies, he only worked for four months in 2009. Both had significant scholarships for law school, so neither is dealing with the massive student debt that many new attorneys have. “I don’t know how you’d begin to make sense of this if you had $120,000 in student loans and were making $30,000,” Jennifer said.

We talked at length about their job searches. Neither Howard nor Jennifer went to law school hoping to work in a big firm. Although they went to different law schools – Howard in the Twin Cities, and Jennifer in a neighboring state – they both saw their schools’ career services offices as single-mindedly focusing on OCI. “Everyone else gets told to network,” Howard said. “The schools really need to work harder for the other 97%.” Jennifer agreed: she has turned to her undergraduate institution for career assistance, and is finding that school to be far more helpful than her law school has been.

It’s not all doom and gloom in the doc review world. Both Jennifer and Howard have made friends while doing doc review. Howard’s found a smoking gun or two, and they laughed about the inappropriate emails people send from work. There’s no pressure to work after hours; you truly leave your work at the office. If it were steady work, Howard said it’d be great; Jennifer would find it tolerable. Unfortunately, the work’s not steady, nor is it reliable, as litigation can settle at any time. Both Howard and Jennifer have been on projects that they were told would last for months, only to have the cases settle in weeks.

In the end, Jennifer said, “I retain hope.” Both continue to look for employment, and take doc review projects as they appear. Howard is considering going back to school, hoping that additional training will complement his law degree and help him find his niche in the practice of law. Jennifer has also thought about returning to school, but is hesitant to take on more debt. In the mean time, she’s expanding her job search, and continues to try to build connections that will lead to employment. “It’s a slow process to getting to something better,” she says. “I will get there.”

[Print] [Email] [RSS Feed] [Facebook] [Twitter]
, , , , ,

This post was written by:

Leah Weaver - who has written 24 posts on JDs Rising.

Leah K. Weaver joined the firm of Reiter & Schiller, P.A. as an associate attorney in 2007. Leah is a graduate of William Mitchell College of Law and Carleton College, and lives in Minneapolis with her husband and their two young daughters.

Contact the author

7 Comments For This Post

  1. Britt Ackerman Says:

    Great post Leah! I really agree with “Howard’s” sentiment regarding OCI and how law schools need to work harder for the other 97%.

  2. Heather Diersen Says:

    Years ago I was told that once you start contract work, it becomes harder to find a full-time, permanent job. Is that true? Why? If it was true, is it still true in this market?

  3. Barb Jones Says:

    Minnesota Lawyer wrote an article about this about a month ago. Check it out at http://minnlawyer.com/2010/07/30/the-horrible-job-market-has-wiped-clean-any-stigma-associated-with-taking-hourly-work/

  4. Leah Weaver Says:

    @Britt: thanks! and, I feel the same way too.
    @Heather: That’s definitely what Howard and Jennifer think, and why they asked me not to use their real names. I did ask them about this. Apparently some doc review agencies sell it as a way to get your foot in the door at the firm. But Jennifer and Howard totally disagree. They feel that the firm associates who supervise them look at contract attorneys as people who weren’t “good enough” to get firm jobs. Their perception is that doc review on your resume is a kiss of death if you’re trying to get a firm job – you’d be better off leaving it off and talking about all the VLN volunteering you did.

  5. Barb Jones Says:

    In Minnesota Lawyer’s story, many placement professionals denied that document review or other contract worth is the kiss of death. Not in this economy, they said.

  6. Leah Weaver Says:

    @Barb I hope they’re right. It’s hard enough to find work out there without being penalized for trying to pay the bills.

  7. Triple Tiger Says:

    “I don’t know how you’d begin to make sense of this if you had $120,000 in student loans and were making $30,000,” Jennifer said.

    Welcome to the reality of the majority of law grads today. And that $120k is non-dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Leave a Reply