<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota Lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnlawyer.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnlawyer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:10:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Target attorney Melisa Franzen to challenge GOP Sen. Geoff Michel</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/08/target-attorney-melisa-franzen-to-challenge-gop-sen-geoff-michel/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/08/target-attorney-melisa-franzen-to-challenge-gop-sen-geoff-michel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Briana Bierschbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/08/target-attorney-melisa-franzen-to-challenge-gop-sen-geoff-michel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franzen announced her bid for the seat on Tuesday, just hours before precinct caucuses kick off across the state. Franzen plans to seek the DFL endorsement for the Senate District 41 seat on Tuesday evening and has no known challengers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/08/target-attorney-melisa-franzen-to-challenge-gop-sen-geoff-michel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Terry’ Stop – Reasonable Suspicion; Consent</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/%e2%80%98terry%e2%80%99-stop-%e2%80%93-reasonable-suspicion-consent/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/%e2%80%98terry%e2%80%99-stop-%e2%80%93-reasonable-suspicion-consent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[‘Terry’ Stop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/%e2%80%98terry%e2%80%99-stop-%e2%80%93-reasonable-suspicion-consent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11-2034 U.S. v. Dunning, appealed from Western District of Missouri, Smith, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/%e2%80%98terry%e2%80%99-stop-%e2%80%93-reasonable-suspicion-consent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enticement – Entrapment; ‘Substantial Step’</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/enticement-%e2%80%93-entrapment-%e2%80%98substantial-step%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/enticement-%e2%80%93-entrapment-%e2%80%98substantial-step%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enticement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/enticement-%e2%80%93-entrapment-%e2%80%98substantial-step%e2%80%99/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10-3867 U.S. v. Herbst, appealed from Southern District of Iowa, Shepherd, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/enticement-%e2%80%93-entrapment-%e2%80%98substantial-step%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supervised Release – Revocation; Special Condition</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/supervised-release-%e2%80%93-revocation-special-condition/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/supervised-release-%e2%80%93-revocation-special-condition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supervised Release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/supervised-release-%e2%80%93-revocation-special-condition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11-1855 U.S. v. Melton, appealed from Northern District of Iowa, Shepherd, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/supervised-release-%e2%80%93-revocation-special-condition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentencing – Reasonableness</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-reasonableness/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-reasonableness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-reasonableness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11-1835 U.S. v. Wilcox, appealed from District of Minnesota, Shepherd, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-reasonableness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentencing – Nature of Offense; Rehabilitative Motive</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-nature-of-offense-rehabilitative-motive/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-nature-of-offense-rehabilitative-motive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-nature-of-offense-rehabilitative-motive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10-3477 U.S. v. Pickar (MLW No. 63241/Case No.– 5 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, Loken, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-nature-of-offense-rehabilitative-motive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentencing – Life Sentence</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-life-sentence/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-life-sentence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-life-sentence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10-3596 U.S. v. Demeyer, appealed from Western District of Arkansas, per curiam.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-life-sentence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentencing – Child Pornography; Factors</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-child-pornography-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-child-pornography-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-child-pornography-factors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10-3696 U.S. v. Nissen, appealed from Northern District of Iowa, Shepherd, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/sentencing-%e2%80%93-child-pornography-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Habeas Relief – Statute of Limitations; Equitable Tolling</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/habeas-relief-%e2%80%93-statute-of-limitations-equitable-tolling/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/habeas-relief-%e2%80%93-statute-of-limitations-equitable-tolling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Habeas Relief]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/habeas-relief-%e2%80%93-statute-of-limitations-equitable-tolling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11-1207 King v. Hobbs, appealed from Eastern District of Arkansas, Wollman, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/habeas-relief-%e2%80%93-statute-of-limitations-equitable-tolling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug Conspiracy – Sufficiency of Evidence; Sentencing</title>
		<link>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/drug-conspiracy-%e2%80%93-sufficiency-of-evidence-sentencing/</link>
		<comments>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/drug-conspiracy-%e2%80%93-sufficiency-of-evidence-sentencing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[8th - Published Criminal Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Conspiracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/drug-conspiracy-%e2%80%93-sufficiency-of-evidence-sentencing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10-3797/10-3828/10-3830/11-1002 U.S. v. Diaz-Pellegaud, appealed from District of South Dakota, Gruender, J.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://minnlawyer.com/2012/02/06/drug-conspiracy-%e2%80%93-sufficiency-of-evidence-sentencing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

