So ordered. Office of Lawyer Regulation, Per CuriamRead More »
“The referee further found that by misappropriating clients’ funds being held in his trust account Attorney Lieuallen violated the standard of conduct set forth by this court in Disciplinary Proceedings Against Marine, 82 Wis. 2d 602, 609-10, 264 N.W.2d 285 ...Read More »
“Tayborn argues that several inconsistencies in his testimony rendered his testimony perjurious and that the prosecution should have known it was perjurious. However, Tayborn only points to collateral inconsistencies in Murchinson’s testimony like: 1) whether he heard a noise before ...Read More »
Where the court is evenly divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals, the decision of the court of appeals must be affirmed. Court of Appeals, Per Curiam Attorneys: For Appellant: Ellen Henak, Madison ...Read More »
The circuit court erred in holding that sec. 961.45 required application of the “elements only” test of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932) to determine whether the prior conviction was for the same act. Accordingly, we reverse the ...Read More »
“New Hampshire’s claim that the Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore is clearly inconsistent with its interpretation of the words ‘Middle of the River’ during the 1970’s litigation… [I]nterpretation of those words was ‘necessary’ to fixing the northern ...
Tagged with: Civil ProcedureRead More »