The Supreme Court has agreed with the state in State v. Brooks and said that where a driver consents to a “search,” i.e. a blood alcohol test, the state need not have a warrant. The court applied a “totality of the circumstances” test to determine that the driver explicitly consented.
Defense attorneys say the decision is not a win for the state. The Supreme Court said that DWI cases are subject to the Fourth Amendment like any other case and DWIs are not “special” when it comes to the defendant’s constitutional rights.
Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman has not yet weighed in with Minnesota Lawyer. We’ll post here when he does.