Quantcast
Home / Minnesota Legal News / Legal News / Court says sentence challenge should proceed
The Court of Appeals sided with a pro se prisoner rather than the attorney general and the Ramsey County attorney Oct. 29 by holding that a motion for correction or reduction of sentence based solely on a challenge to the accuracy of the criminal-history score is properly brought under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, and isn’t subject to the two-year postconviction statute of limitations.

Court says sentence challenge should proceed

The Court of Appeals sided with a pro se prisoner rather than the attorney general and the Ramsey County attorney Oct. 29 by holding that a motion for correction or reduction of sentence based solely on a challenge to the accuracy of the criminal-history score is properly brought under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, and isn’t subject to the two-year postconviction statute of limitations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*