Quantcast
Home / All News / Supreme Court affirms ruling on duty to care
A person may satisfy one’s duty of reasonable care to another by warning the other person of the foreseeable danger, even when no special relationship exists between them, the Minnesota Supreme Court decided Oct. 26 in Domagala v. Rolland.

Supreme Court affirms ruling on duty to care

A person may satisfy one’s duty of reasonable care to another by warning the other person of the foreseeable danger, even when no special relationship exists between them, the Minnesota Supreme Court decided Oct. 26 in Domagala v. Rolland.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*