Civil Procedure – Diversity; Foreign Corporation 
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, May 31, 2010
By Minnesota Lawyer
Tags: Civil Procedure
Where plaintiffs are incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and have their principal place of business in Connecticut; and plaintiffs have sued investment fund managers and an outside auditor with citizenship in Minnesota, Delaware and Bermuda; the court concludes that it cannot exercise diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)(3), which confers jurisdiction where a dispute is between “citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties,” because this section does not confer jurisdiction where the only plaintiffs are foreign corporations. “Plaintiffs obviously chose to incorporate in the British Virgin Islands for a reason, yet they ask the Court to pretend Connecticut is their sole citizenship for diversity purposes. . . . [T]his Court holds it must consider each plaintiff’s dual citizenship when deciding whether diversity jurisdiction exists.”
| Case Number | 09-CV-1736 |
| Case Name | In re: Arrowhead Capital Management LLC Class Litigation |
| Court | U.S. District Court |
| District | D. Minn. |
| Category | Civil Procedure |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)


POST A COMMENT