DISCOVERY SANCTION – Default Judgment; Pro Se Debtor 
Posted: 1:00 am Thu, May 6, 2010
By admin
Where a Chapter 7 debtor repeatedly refused to answer questions from a creditor about his assets and the bankruptcy court repeatedly advised him that sanctions and a default judgment against him could result, the debtor’s pro se representation was not an excuse, and the court did not abuse its discretion in striking the debtor’s answer and entering default judgment against him.
Judgment is affirmed.
| Case Number | 10-6007 |
| Case Name | Harmon Autoglass Intellectual Property v. Leiferman |
| Court | U.S. BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL |
| District | Appealed from the District of Minnesota |
| Category | DISCOVERY SANCTION |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)


POST A COMMENT