Quantcast

Constitutional Law – Confrontation Clause (access required)

Posted: 1:00 am Mon, March 22, 2010
By admin
Tags:

The admission of grand jury testimony of a potential State witness who expressed reluctance to testify at trial violated the defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights and was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.Because the evidence implicating defendant was legally sufficient, a retrial of the defendant does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.Reversed and remanded for a ...

Comments

Comments are closed.






Minnesota Lawyer e-Brief

Legal news updates every Tuesday and Friday.
Email:

Follow us on social media



Dolan Media Copyright © 2012 MINNESOTA LAWYERS  |   Minnesota Lawyer, 730 South Second Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612)333-4244