-
Home > Opinions > Court of Appeals > Civil Procedure – Objection to Standing
Civil Procedure – Objection to Standing
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, March 22, 2010
By admin
Tags: Civil Procedure
Where a title company questioned the standing of an insurer as an alleged subrogee; and the standing issue was raised at the damages trial, after the District Court had entered partial summary judgment as to liability; we conclude that the District Court did not err in determining that the objections was untimely because the lateness of the title company’s standing objection unjustly prejudiced the insurer’s ability to respond.
We deny the additional claims of error.
Affirmed.
| Case Number | A09-0506 |
| Case Name | American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co. v. Brookfield Home Loans, Inc. |
| Court | Court of Appeals |
| County | Hennepin County |
| Category | Civil Procedure |
| Type | Published Civil Opinions |
| URL | http://www.minnlawyer.com/userfiles/pdf/opa090506-0316.htm |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://minnlawyer.com/2010/03/22/civil-procedure-objection-to-standing/&title=Civil Procedure – Objection to Standing <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://twitter.com/home/?status=Civil Procedure – Objection to Standing <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>+http://minnlawyer.com/2010/03/22/civil-procedure-objection-to-standing/)
POST A COMMENT