Quantcast

APPELLATE PRACTICE – Interlocutory Review; Rule 54(b) Certification; Finality of Judgment (access required)

Posted: 1:00 am Mon, March 22, 2010
By admin
Tags:

Where an inmate brought a civil rights action against various prison-official defendants and the parties sought interlocutory review, entering a stipulation in which the inmate agreed to dismiss his one remaining claim without prejudice and to reinstate it if he should prevail on appeal of any of the dismissed claims, the parties attempted to “manufacture” appellate jurisdiction and the District Court abused its discretion by certifying the case for appeal without an adequate explanation that there was “no just reason for delay” under Rule 54(b). Appeal is dismissed.

[Print] [Email] [RSS Feed] [Facebook] [Twitter]

POST A COMMENT






Minnesota Lawyer e-Brief

Legal news updates every Tuesday and Friday.
Email:

Follow us on social media



Dolan Media Copyright © 2012 MINNESOTA LAWYERS  |   Minnesota Lawyer, 730 South Second Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612)333-4244