-
Home > Opinions > 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals > INSURANCE – Property Insurance; Indemnification; Business Expenses
INSURANCE – Property Insurance; Indemnification; Business Expenses
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, March 15, 2010
By admin
Tags: Insurance
Where a poultry processing company sought coverage under its property insurance and business interruption policy after an ice storm cut off electrical service resulting in the deaths of chickens, the policy unambiguously excluded coverage for the insured’s business expenses and personal property claims. Judgment is reversed in part; affirmed in part.
| Case Number | 09-2220/09-2248 |
| Case Name | George |
| Court | 8th U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS |
| District | Appealed from the Western District of Arkansas |
| Category | Insurance |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://minnlawyer.com/2010/03/15/insurance-property-insurance-indemnification-business-expenses/&title=INSURANCE – Property Insurance; Indemnification; Business Expenses <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://twitter.com/home/?status=INSURANCE – Property Insurance; Indemnification; Business Expenses <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>+http://minnlawyer.com/2010/03/15/insurance-property-insurance-indemnification-business-expenses/)
POST A COMMENT