Quantcast

EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE – Discrimination; Discovery; Admissions (access required)

Posted: 1:00 am Mon, March 15, 2010
By admin

Where a plaintiff who sued his employer for discrimination and retaliation under the ADA failed to respond to the employer’s requests for admissions, and the plaintiff made no filing with the District Court that could be construed as a motion to amend or withdraw under Rule 36(b) even after being directed to do so, the court properly granted summary judgment to the employer based on the admissions, which bore directly on the issue of liability. Judgment is affirmed.

[Print] [Email] [RSS Feed] [Facebook] [Twitter]

POST A COMMENT






Minnesota Lawyer e-Brief

Legal news updates every Tuesday and Friday.
Email:

Follow us on social media



Dolan Media Copyright © 2012 MINNESOTA LAWYERS  |   Minnesota Lawyer, 730 South Second Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612)333-4244